The New Anti-Semitism
by Rabbi David Zaslow

The other day Linda Cotrufello posted an article on this site. The article has been going around the internet and was also posted on another community bulletin board here in Ashland. My response here is strictly to the author of the article and not to Linda. I assume her motives are good and based on her care for our society. But the actual article is by a controversial conspiracy theorist named Victor Thorn. He describes himself in his website bio as the author of books like "9-11: The Israeli Role in 9-11" and "Phantom Flight 93."

The article posted is called "Obama Inner Circle Filled with Bilderbergs." It is frightening not because of its accuracy, but because such inaccuracy actually has an audience. Mr. Thorn's article speaks uses buzz words like "Jewish triad..." and "Irgun terrorist gang" and "strong Zionist sympathizer" are nothing but veiled anti-Semitism. First "Jewish triad." I notice Mr. Thron does not refer to Presbyterian triads or Buddisht triads...only Jews are singled out. Second, regarding the "Irgun terrorist gang" if you study history you will see that the Irgun were fighting against British colonialism. Were their tactics controversial? Yes. Were they terrorists? Hardly. As much as I might personally repudiate their tactics the targets they chose were never civilian, but, rather, the British colonial armed forces. And putting things in historical context it is important to remember that the Irgun represented a small minority of the Jewish people in British occupied Palestine during the late 1930's and early 1940's – a desperate time for the Jewish people.

Finally, using the term "Zionist sympathizer" as a pejorative term against Vice Presidentelect Biden is very odd. Marlin Luther King too was proud to call himself a Zionist, and so were many Black leaders in the civil rights movement. After all, what is Zionism? Jihadists say that Zionism is racism because they have a stated goal of wiping Israel off the map. But most Christians, Muslims, and level, objective students of history know that Zionism was just a anti-colonial movement declaring the right of Jews to have a homeland just like every African country (and many Asian countries too) who also had national liberation movements in the 1940's.

Because of my own Zionism I am a "Tibetan sympathizer" today, and a sympathizer of all people to have their own homelands free of colonial, Jihadist, or dictatorial presence. Israel has always stood on this principle of some kind of two-state solution since its rebirth in 1947-1948. Anti-Zionism is the new anti-Semitism. Israel is the scapegoat just as the "Jew" was in the 1930's. I remember reading John Birch society literature like "None Dare Call it Treason" in the 1960's. The new anti-Zionism is just rehashed John Birch conspiracy theories that focus on the "Jew" as the cause of society's problems during economic hard times. All of us need to be aware during this challenging time in our economy not to let sloppy scholarship and outright deception make the Jews or Israelis scapegoats once again. We learned from the Holocaust the result of national paranoia by one of the most intellectual societies in all of Europe.

Today, crazed ideas like the Jews not coming to work on 9-11, or the Israeli Mossad being behind the attacks, or Jews gaining control of the economy, or Zionism being the cause of unrest in the Middle East – all of these ideas need to be repudiated quickly by all of us. As we should never tolerate racist comments, sexist comments, homophobic comments, and bigoted comments against Muslims, we should not be silent with the newest incarnation of anti-Semitism (anti-Zionism) that has leapt the fire lines from some circles on the far right to some circles on far left.

For further reading take a look at feminist author Phyllis Chesler's "The New Anti-Semitism" or "The Case for Israel" by Alan Dershowitz. On that note, I bless all of us in our wonderful community with a meaningful solstice celebration, a wonderful Christmas, a fantastic Kwanzaa, and a transformative Hanukkah!

Views: 174


You need to be a member of Ashland Source Center to add comments!

Join Ashland Source Center

Comment by Madeleine Sklar on March 6, 2009 at 2:33pm
Ayala, I am grateful to always find your arguments very articulate and well informed.
Comment by Havurah Shir Hadash on December 19, 2008 at 2:05pm
Thanks Linda, I appreciate your response.
Comment by Ashland Source Center on December 19, 2008 at 1:16pm
Thank you Ayala for posting your response. I admire Rabbi David for all he is doing to bring the community together and create peace, regardless of religious backround. As you noted, I am only passing on information for our network and mean no harm. It is good that we have this open conversation and a place to clear the energy.

Linda Cotrufello

Coronavirus News

Explosive If True: “I’m a Clinical Lab Scientist, C19 Is Fake, Wake up America” | The True Defender !

What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S. PCR test. We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as we did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which CDC said they could not provide as they did not have any samples. We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious. The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema etc. and they then got the flu which further weakened their immune system and they died. I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid 19 to work with. We at the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid 19 fraud. the CDC has yet to send us a single viable, isolated and purifed sample of Covid 19. If they can’t or won’t send us a viable sample, I say there is no Covid 19, it is fictitious. The four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples. All the four papers written on Covid 19 only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which is NOT A VIRUS. A viral genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs.

COVID-19 Nasal Swab Test Led To Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak | Forbes

Many who’ve had a nasal Covid-19 test performed on themselves have described it as feeling like that swab got as far back as their brains. If done correctly, the swab is angled parallel to the floor, all the way to the back of the nose, and the swab is rubbed on an area called the nasopharynx. The actual term is a nasopharyngeal swab, not nasal swab, because it’s the nasopharynx that contains the highest possible viral load to best determine an active Covid-19 infection. The distance from the average nasal tip to the nasopharynx is close to 6 inches. So if it feels like there’s a half a foot being stuck up your nose, well, you’re not so far off.

US to Require Quarantine for All International Air Travelers | The Epoch Times

President Joe Biden on Jan. 21 issued an executive order that would require international air travelers to quarantine upon arrival to the United States.

CDC says asymptomatic people don't need testing, draws criticism from experts | TheHill

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) quietly changed its guidance on Monday to now say that asymptomatic people do not need to be tested for coronavirus, even if they have been in close contact with an infected person. The agency made the move by updating its website but did not make any public announcement or explain the reasoning behind the major revision.  The guidance now states: “If you have been in close contact (within 6 feet) of a person with a COVID-19 infection for at least 15 minutes but do not have symptoms: You do not necessarily need a test unless you are a vulnerable individual or your health care provider or State or local public health officials recommend you take one.”

What Kind of Covid Test Should I Get? Answers on Cost, Accuracy and More | WSJ

There are two generally available types of Covid-19 tests. The first, and most commonly used so far, is a PCR test, which is short for polymerase chain reaction. It’s a molecular test, meaning it searches for the virus’s genetic material in a nasal swab or saliva sample, and it is often processed in a highly complex laboratory. There are two ways to collect a nasal sample: from the inside of a nostril, or from the back of the nose and throat. The second way, called a nasopharyngeal swab, requires a professional to probe more deeply into the nasal cavity to get the sample. Some testing sites may ask you to swab your nose or cheek yourself, or spit into a tube. Each of these collection methods creates a sample that can be analyzed with a PCR test. Antigen tests, which search the sample for viral proteins instead of the virus’s genetic code, are becoming more widespread in the U.S. Right now, antigen tests are typically offered at doctor’s offices, nursing homes, schools and other congregate settings where groups of people need testing fast.

© 2021   Created by Ashland Source Center.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service